Making sense (and cents) of Climate Change


Last night, I reread a piece on Climate Change by Amory Lovins from more than a decade ago.  It provides an excellent discussion not so much about the science of climate change, but why energy-efficiency makes sense in it’s own right.  He concludes the long discussion by dispelling some myths.  A few were particularly striking:


• It’s about climate science. No; it doesn’t matter what the climate science says, or even whether it’s right, because we ought to be purchasing energy efficiency anyway just to save money.


• It’s about who should bear the costs. What costs? The interesting question is who should get the profits. That’s a good thing to compete about in the marketplace, but it shouldn’t require difficult negotiations.161 The “polluter pays principle”—OECD doctrine since 1974—remains valid, but this time the polluter can profit.


• It’s about sharing sacrifices for the common good. On the contrary, it’s about helping individuals, firms, and nations to behave in their economic self-interest.


• It’s about “cutting back,” shifting to a lifestyle of privation and discomfort—as the Chairman of Chrysler Corporation recently put it, “dimming the lights, turning off the air conditioning, sacrificing some of our industrial competitiveness and curtailing economic growth.”  No; it’s about living even better with less cost, by using smarter technologies that yield the same or better service. The showers will be as hot and tingly as now, the beer as cold, the rooms as well-lit, the homes as cozy in winter and as cool in summer, the cars as peppy, safe, and comfortable; but we’ll have substituted brains for therms and design for dollars.


Exactly!  We can have cold beer and hot showers. (I’m a fan of both!)  But we can do it wisely by eliminating waste.  By eliminating waste, we can do it more cheaply, keeping money in our pockets, in the college fund, or in investments, rather than throwing it up the chimney.  Energy-efficiency is just good home economics.




Tags: , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Making sense (and cents) of Climate Change”

  1. Tom Tucker Says:

    Hi Mike,

    Enjoy the blog and the information you are sharing here. I would be please if you register your blog at, which allow us to include your blog posts in our content flow. You would be among our first users, and once we build our readership, this will offer you a great way to attract new readers to your blog and grow your business.

    Looking forward to hearing from you.


    Tom Tucker
    Managing Editor

  2. GreenOfficeBlog Says:

    This piece makes some really great points. It’s interesting how people always interpret green efforts as ways to “cut back” and “simplify,” when they’re really about enjoying the earth more. And it’s true that people seem to dwell on the costs, rather than the money that will be saved. It seems as if the classic writings are always the best, as far as academic scholarship goes.

  3. Kansans for energy independence « GreenHomes America Says:

    […] Amory Lovins says, it doesn’t matter whether you believe in global warming or not–most of the things […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: