NYTimes: U.S. Military Orders Less Dependence on Fossil Fuels

by

Last week, the NY Times reported on the “greening” of the military, and their focus on reducing fossil fuel use.  There moving in this direction because it makes sense–it increases their operation security.

And as a country, we ought to be looking at it in much the same way.  This isn’t about tree-hugging (although I’m certainly now above hugging the occasional tree).  It’s also about economic vitality and national security.  If we throw our money overseas, it doesn’t stay here in our own communities.  If we rely on the rest of the world for our energy needs, we become beholden to them.  If we pump pollution into the atmosphere, we pay for it with increases health costs, damaged crops and forests, and barren lakes.

We should practice the common sense policy of efficiency first.  Because it’s smart economics, it increases our security, and it good stewarship of of resources–for its own sake and for ours.

Thanks,
Mike

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “NYTimes: U.S. Military Orders Less Dependence on Fossil Fuels”

  1. Hope for sound energy policy? Can left and right take the smart path? « GreenHomes America Says:

    […] might not rule the day.  We posted recently not just about environmentalists, but also the military, veterans, and climate nay-sayers all embracing sound energy policy including energy-efficiency.  […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: