Hope for sound energy policy? Can left and right take the smart path?

by

One day, political finger-pointing, oneupsmanship, and gridlock might not rule the day.  We posted recently not just about environmentalists, but also the military, veterans, and climate nay-sayers all embracing sound energy policy including energy-efficiency.  And maybe a new report “Pro-Partisan Power”—the result of think tanks on both sides of the political spectrum working working together, the Brookings Institution, Breakthrough Institute and the American Enterprise Institute—is a sign that on this issue, the sides might meet.

While it’s not exactly the way I’d frame it, the report’s author note in their summary,

“Today, few issues in American political life are as polarized as energy policy, with both left and right entrenched in old worldviews that no longer make sense. For the better part of two decades, much of the right has speculated darkly about global warming as a United Nations-inspired conspiracy to destroy American sovereignty, all while passing off chants of “drill, baby, drill” as real energy policy. During the same period much of the left has oscillated incoherently between exhortations that avoiding the end of the world demands shared sacrifice, and contradictory assertions that today’s renewable energy and efficiency technologies can eliminate fossil fuels at no significant cost. All the while, America’s dependence on fossil fuels continues unabated and political gridlock deepens, preventing real progress towards a safer, cleaner, more secure energy system.”

A similar thought is echoed by David Leonhardt who hinted at the report’s release a few days ahead of time (can you echo in advance?  Perhaps if you got to read the report early you can.) in a NY Times column.   As the Leonhardt notes,

“[H]istory shows that government-directed research can work. The Defense Department created the Internet, as part of a project to build a communications system safe from nuclear attack. The military helped make possible radar, microchips and modern aviation, too. The National Institutes of Health spawned the biotechnology industry. All those investments have turned into engines of job creation, even without any new tax on the technologies they replaced.”

Of course, this applies smart investment—and that does mean spending some money at a time when the cry is for both tax cuts and erasing the budget deficit—a nontrivial challenge.  Of course, the McKinsey report showed that this was smart especially when driven by energy-efficiency savings.

But time isn’t on our side.  Our current energy policy is wasteful, it hurts the economy, it hurts the environment, and it leaves us very strategically vulnerable.  Let’s hope the new Congress cares more about doing what is right for the country than cutting down the the other side.  Like it or not, at the end of the day, when it comes to our energy policy, we’re all on the same side, win or lose.

Thanks,
Mike

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: